How to Keep Your Short Film Small
The summary of the article is how to make a good short film, short, and still being able to keep your viewers attention. Good short films keep the scope small, but they must have emotionally resonant endings and boil down your characters, setting and story to only whats absolutely necessary.
The authors main argument is "The most philosophically invigorating or emotionally captivating shorts are the ones that are the shortest and the most subtle.
Since the authors argument is to keep the film basically "short and sweet", you always want to "leave your audience with something to chew on; even better, leave us with something more." The author also says "the most effective way to make your short memorable is to inject as much pathos as possible into the ending... if you do this, your audience will feel for your character right as "the ending" fades in."
While reading this article the authors strengths are giving good advice on what to do and how to make it easier on yourself, for example "make a list of everyone you may think will be able to help you out in any way possible- even if its something as small as donating a meal." also, "don't shoot your self in the foot and empty your bank account to get it done". Throughout the article i did not see any of his weaknesses with this article but there are probably some article out there that shows his weakness.
While reading this article, the authors general conclusion is to make sure you always have your readers attention because if you don't then they will lose their focus and drive to want to watch your short film.
I do believe that the authors argument does support the main points.
The authors evidence is convincing because he shows and talks about very good reasons why and why not do things that could make or break your short film.
While reading this article, the authors general conclusion is to make sure you always have your readers attention because if you don't then they will lose their focus and drive to want to watch your short film.
I do believe that the authors argument does support the main points.
The authors evidence is convincing because he shows and talks about very good reasons why and why not do things that could make or break your short film.