Professional Article Review

The article Creative Anarchy at its Very Best is simply saying that its okay to break the rules of design but in order to break the rules, you have to know the rules. The authors main claim is "Breaking design rules means testing the limits of your creativity, challenging your strengths and strengthening your weaknesses" (paragraph 11). The authors argument is basically the same thing as their main claim, trying to design out of your comfort zone. When the author said "The ability to push boundaries is a respected quality. It shows that you are willing to go beyond the expected by the demonstrating that you will invest time and creative strategy in a design concept" (paragraph 10) I think that they were trying to say that when you are creating something randomly that you do not ever really think about what you are making, it just comes to mind which is shown in the way your design turns out to look like. I am concluding this by understanding that it is okay to break the rules when you are creating a design, but you have to know when it is an appropriate to break the rules and when it is not appropriate to break the rules.